Home   News   National   Article

Sunak says pensions triple lock remains Government policy as he faces £4bn bill

By PA News

Contribute to support quality local journalism

Mr Sunak was pressed on whether he would be prepared to pay the bill (Yui Mok/PA)

Rishi Sunak has said the triple lock on pensions remains Government policy after it emerged he could be forced to spend £4 billion more on pensioners from next year if he sticks to the pledge.

The Chancellor was grilled on the issue after data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) on Tuesday revealed there was a record jump in earnings, with pay excluding bonuses up 5.6% in the quarter to April.

The triple-lock promise ensures that pensions rise annually by the highest out of average earnings growth, inflation or 2.5%, meaning the Chancellor would need to link pensions to earning growth if it remained at this level.

That's how the triple lock works. That is the Government policy
Rishi Sunak

However, the ONS said the 5.6% increase has been distorted following a big fall in earnings during the first lockdown last year, while many jobs axed in the pandemic have also being lower-paid roles.

In an interview with GB News, Mr Sunak was pressed on whether he would be prepared to pay the bill, estimated at around £4 billion, amid criticism over the funding provided to help school children catch up on missed lessons.

The Chancellor said: “The triple lock is the Government policy but I can’t pre-empt, there’s a statutory review that happens in the autumn through a parliamentary process and it’s not right for me to pre-empt that.”

Mr Sunak said that the figures were “speculation”, but when questioned on whether he would pay this if earnings turned out to be the highest, he replied: “That’s how the triple lock works.

“That is the Government policy.”

Pension experts have already highlighted concerns about fairness between the generations, with many of the working population are facing pay freezes amid the coronavirus crisis.

The Treasury has already hinted that it faces a balancing act with the issue, saying the focus was to “ensure fairness for both pensioners and taxpayers”, according to the Financial Times.

Do you want to respond to this article? If so, click here to submit your thoughts and they may be published in print.

This website is powered by the generosity of readers like you.
Please donate what you can afford to help us keep our communities informed.


In these testing times, your support is more important than ever. Thank you.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies - Learn More